You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students
Keywords:
grammar, grammar checker, Grammarly, online materials, feedback, writing, Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract
Feedback on students’ writing is considered an instrumental part of the academic advising process. However, due to the time constraints of the student-adviser interaction, Academic Language and Learning (ALL) advisers may find it difficult to provide comprehensive feedback to students regarding their grammatical mistakes. One solution is to utilise online grammar checking tools as a complement to feedback from an adviser. These tools can save advisers’ time and resources while at the same time promote greater self-directed learning and foster students’ self-efficacy. In spite of this, many Australian higher education institutions have overlooked this intersection between grammar support and online automated technology. This paper presents an overview of Grammarly, a popular online grammar checking website. In addition, this paper provides preliminary results of an evaluation of Grammarly by students at two Navitas colleges, the Australian College of Applied Psychology (ACAP) and Navitas College of Public Safety (NCPS). The students’ survey responses are analysed against Davis’ (1989) Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which offers a conceptual framework for predicting the acceptability and use of a technology. The results reveal that students perceive Grammarly as useful and easy to use, and students reported that Grammarly improved their writing and understanding of grammar rules.Downloads
Published
2016-01-25
How to Cite
Cavaleri, M. R., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), A223-A236. Retrieved from https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/393
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The copyright for articles in this journal is retained by the author(s), with the exclusion of the AALL logo and any other copyrighted material reproduced with permission, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Unless indicated otherwise, original content from articles may be used under the terms of the CC-BY-NC licence. Permission for any uses not covered by this licence must be obtained from the author(s). Authors submitting to this journal are assumed to agree to having their work archived in the National Library of Australia’s PANDORA archive.